Carrol
Carrol Cox wrote:
>
> Then he is either using "model" as a mere (and not too good) synony for
> "abstraction" or he is wrong. Models as used in economics havd no
> placve in Marx.
>
> Carrol
>
> Doug Henwood wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 5, 2009, at 6:18 PM, John Gulick wrote:
> >
> > > Cue Doug's channeling of Marx on "rural idiocy" as well as his
> > > mockery of
> > > utopian, "small is beautiful" anti-modernists.
> >
> > Ha. Hardly have to. The image of months of solitude - or the
> > companionship of the same small crew of fellow peasants - did all the
> > work for me.
> >
> > Doug
> > ___________________________________
> > http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk