On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:39 PM, Alan Rudy wrote:
> I read it as saying the decade ending in Sept. 1974, which I took to
> mean
> 1965-1974 and shoulda called the "late-60s/early-70s"
> either way, I struggle to believe that mid-65-to-the-first-oil-shock
> was as
> bad as the last decade when it came to investments.... and you just
> told me
> there was a weak rally early in the 70s
Norris ran the numbers, and they look right to me. So why the "struggle to believe"?
Doug