On Feb 28, 2009, at 7:20 AM, Michael Pollak wrote:
> [Can our Canadian friends elaborate on the idea that Canadian banks
> are "all broadly owned by public shareholders." Is that in any way
> different from the normal meaning of being a publicly owned company
> -- i.e., being entirely owned privately?]
>
> [Rhetorically it's a nifty move to say that adopting the Canadian
> model would mean going back to Hamilton's original vision.]
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/28/opinion/28tedesco.html
This piece prompted a blog polemic:
<http://doughenwood.wordpress.com/2009/02/28/the-virtues-of-concentration/
>.
Doug