Actual statistics to back this up would be an interesting concept: over the history of Medicare, what percentage of those covered have also had private coverage? I suspect that this percentage has shifted as the role and from of pensions / insurance for retirees has changed and also as life expectancy has increased.
Wonder if the decimation of people's retirement savings in the recent economic collapse is going to make people more passionate about a public plan?
DC
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Chuck Grimes<cgrimes at rawbw.com> wrote:
> Obama Urges Groups to Stop Attacks Advocates Should Turn Attention to
> Promoting Legislation..
>
> -----
>
> I love it. The liberals killed healthcare reform. It wasn't the
> rightwing, or the ever helpful insurance companies. It was the damned
> liberals who did in our best efforts to find compromise.
>
> In case anybody thinks that Medicare is the answer should consider
> that part A is hospital coverage. Part B, which is deducted from you
> Social Security benefit, is out patient care. This means you pay for
> it just like any other insurance coverage. And well part D is the
> bullshit Rx coverage which also has a fee deducted and a co-pay that
> magically goes to 100% if you need anything over 2000/yr. Well because
> most people over 65 have health problems from working all their life
> for nothing. They have heart, lung, muscle and joint problems so
> naturally they only deserve a few months worth of overpriced
> medications.
>
> Well, but the perfectly healthy bankers really need their billions of
> dollars...
>
> CG
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>