[lbo-talk] duh, DeLong

Wojtek Sokolowski swsokolowski at yahoo.com
Thu Jul 23 06:46:37 PDT 2009


Here is the breakdown by industry http://www.bls.gov/news.release/tenure.t05.htm

and occupation http://www.bls.gov/news.release/tenure.t06.htm

Please note shorter median tenure in services, whose share vis a vis mfg has been constantly growing. Please also note the difference between professional and managerial service and production occupations vs other service occupation.

Wojtek

--- On Thu, 7/23/09, Wojtek Sokolowski <swsokolowski at yahoo.com> wrote:


> From: Wojtek Sokolowski <swsokolowski at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] duh, DeLong
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Date: Thursday, July 23, 2009, 9:28 AM
>
> Do you have a breakdown by industry?
>
> I suspect that the perception of 'disappearing job tenures'
> may be partly due to the fact that is happening only in the
> high profile sectors of the US economy (such as the auto
> industry) but in other sectors it was always "employment at
> will," high turnover, etc.  So the "disappearing
> tenures" in high profile industries create an illusion that
> the US job market as a whole is going to the dogs, whereas
> in reality it has been there all the time, except for a few
> high profile sectors.
>
> Wojtek
>
> --- On Wed, 7/22/09, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com>
> > Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] duh, DeLong
> > To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> > Date: Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 2:58 PM
> >
> > On Jul 22, 2009, at 2:36 PM, Matthias Wasser wrote:
> >
> > > Does "temporary and flexible" neccessarily mean
> > part-time or temp? The
> > > number of careers and jobs an American has over
> her
> > lifetime has increased,
> > > for instance.
> >
> > That's not all that clear either. Here's the history
> on job
> > tenure. Note that the median number of years on the
> job for
> > men in 2008 was about a year below what it was in
> 1966, but
> > that's offset by an increase for women, leaving the
> overall
> > figure unchanged. Similiarly with the share of workers
> on
> > the same job for 10 years or more - though those stats
> only
> > begin in 1983.
> >
> >              
> >    all   
> >    men      women
> >
> > median job tenure (years)
> >       1951   
> >    3.4   
> >    3.9       2.2
> >       1963   
> >    4.6   
> >    5.7       3.0
> >       1966   
> >    4.2   
> >    5.2       2.8
> >       1968   
> >    3.8   
> >    4.8       2.4
> >       1973   
> >    3.9   
> >    4.6       2.8
> >       1978   
> >    3.6   
> >    4.5       2.6
> >       1981   
> >    3.2   
> >    4.0       2.5
> >       1983   
> >    3.5   
> >    4.1       3.1
> >       1987   
> >    3.4   
> >    4.0       3.0
> >       1991   
> >    3.6   
> >    4.1       3.2
> >       1996   
> >    3.8   
> >    4.0       3.5
> >       1998   
> >    3.6   
> >    3.8       3.4
> >       2000   
> >    3.5   
> >    3.8       3.3
> >       2002   
> >    3.7   
> >    3.9       3.4
> >       2004   
> >    4.0   
> >    4.1       3.8
> >       2006   
> >    4.0   
> >    4.1       3.9
> >       2008   
> >    4.1   
> >    4.2       3.9
> >
> > share of over-25 with >10 years
> >       1983      31.9 
> >     37.7      24.9
> >       1987      30.7 
> >     35.0      25.7
> >       1991      32.2 
> >     35.9      28.2
> >       1996      30.5 
> >     33.1      27.6
> >       1998      30.7 
> >     32.7      28.4
> >       2000      31.5 
> >     33.4      29.5
> >       2002      30.8 
> >     32.6      28.8
> >       2004      30.6 
> >     32.4      28.6
> >       2006      30.0 
> >     31.1      28.8
> >       2008      31.5 
> >     32.9      30.0
> >
> > ___________________________________
> > http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
> >
>
>
>      
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list