[lbo-talk] Hamid Dabashi on Iran

[shag carpet bomb]

At 12:02 AM 6/23/2009, northsunm at yahoo.com wrote:
>The line implies that if you support the protesters and their leaders such 
>as Mousavi and Rafsanjani then you are supporting a group that will 
>probably help advance the interests of US imperialism--not that they 
>themselves are interested per se in that.

quick. quick. quick. top ten reasons why the sky will fall if one of these 
two jokers becomes prez and they start dialogues with the u.s. to end 
sanctions.

pretend you are writing for LEtterman!

i say that jokingly, but it's a serious question to all the geo-political 
whizzes on the list. what are the consequences and how would they be bad 
for Iranians? i think it'd be really cool to generate . . . 10 reasons!

"let's be civil and nice, but not to the point of obeying the rules of 
debate as defined by liberal blackmail (in which, discomfort caused by a 
challenge is seen as some vague form of harassment)."

                                    -- Dwayne Monroe, 11/19/08

--
http://cleandraws.com
Wear Clean Draws