On Jun 26, 2009, at 6:09 PM, ken hanly wrote:
> Do you really think that the Guardian council would admit that this
> phenomenom took place if they thought that it proved that there was
> fraud or ballot stuffing?You don't address the argument at all. You
> just accuse Huato of apologetics. What sort of argumentation is
> that? Well I will answer for you. It is an ad hominem fallacy.
Wrong hominem, dude - it was Mark Weisbrot I was arguing with. But the GC had to admit something was a little fishy, just for the sake of their credibility.