On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 3:45 AM, James Heartfield
<Heartfield at blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Phil Jones of the Hadley Climate Research Unit plots to exclude those who
> disagree with him from access to peer-reviewed journals
>
> "This was the danger of always criticising the skeptics for not publishing
> in the "peer-reviewed literature". Obviously, they found a solution to
> that-take over a journal! So what do we do about this? I think we have to
> stop considering "Climate Research" as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal.
> Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community
> to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal. We would also need
> to consider what we tell or request of our more reasonable colleagues who
> currently sit on the editorial board.What do others think?"
>
> "I will be emailing the journal to tell them I'm having nothing more to do
> with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor."
>
> "It results from this journal having a number of editors. The responsible
> one for this is a well-known skeptic in NZ. He has let a few papers through
> by Michaels and Gray in the past. I've had words with Hans von Storch about
> this, but got nowhere. Another thing to discuss in Nice !"
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>