Which is not to say that science is a perfect, abstract process whose outcomes are immune to influence by assism, but unless you're prepared to allege that the entire climatological discipline is a sinister conspiracy of lying asses, that won't be the dynamic behind the global consensus on climate change.
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:36 AM, Chris Doss <lookoverhere1 at yahoo.com> wrote:
James, I double-dog dare you to critique the actual science of climate
> change, rather then quoting some guy's emails.
>
-- "Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre, mod sceal þe mare, þe ure mægen lytlað."