[lbo-talk] Michaels, Against Diversity

andie nachgeborenen andie_nachgeborenen at yahoo.com
Sun Oct 4 19:07:40 PDT 2009


Anything new here? Isn't this the Black Nationalism - Marxism debate (shouting match) we wasted so much time on the 60s and 70s, Harold Cruse, the Nation of Islam, etc. vs. Marxists who, tripping over themselves to acknowledge the importance of racial oppression, basically treated it as either a distraction from the class struggle or secondary to the oppression of workers, so something we didn't really get around to till After The Revolution?

Wasn't there someone who once said that history repeats itself, the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce? Some old guy with a beard. WEB DuBois, maybe.

--- On Sun, 10/4/09, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:


> From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com>
> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Michaels, Against Diversity
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Date: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 4:23 PM
>
> On Oct 4, 2009, at 5:09 PM, wrobert at uci.edu
> wrote:
>
> > I thought Reed's comments on this question were quite
> interesting(on
> > the show, it was one of the more provocative things
> that I have heard
> > in a while), but in a certain sense, despite the fact
> that Tim's
> > response isn't the most coherent thing that I have
> read, and is
> > missing the target a bit in his critique of you,
> certainly doesn't
> > fit the mold of the multi-culturalist who dismisses
> the need to
> > critique capital.
>
> In the latest LBO, Adolph has a piece on "anti-racism,"
> which, as you might imagine, is rather critical of the
> concept. I'll be posting it to the web in a couple of weeks.
> But here's a relevant excerpt:
>
> > Anti-Marx. I've been struck by the level of visceral
> and vitriolic anti-Marxism I've seen from this strain of
> defenders of antiracism as a politics. It's not clear to me
> what drives it because it takes the form of snide dismissals
> than direct arguments. Moreover, the dismissals typically
> include empty acknowledgment that "of course we should
> oppose capitalism," whatever that might mean. In any event,
> the tenor of this anti-Marxism is reminiscent of those
> right-wing discourses, many of which masqueraded as liberal,
> in which only invoking the word "Marxism" was sufficient to
> dismiss an opposing argument or position.
> >
> > This anti-Marxism has some curious effects. Leading
> professional antiracist Tim Wise came to the defense of
> Obama's purged green jobs czar Van Jones by dismissing
> Jones's "brief stint with a pseudo-Maoist group," and
> pointing instead to "his more recent break with such groups
> and philosophies, in favor of a commitment to eco-friendly,
> sustainable capitalism." In fact, Jones was a core member of
> a revolutionary organization, STORM, that took itself very
> seriously, almost comically so.
> >
> > And are we to applaud his break with radical politics
> in favor of a style of capitalism that few actual
> capitalists embrace? This is the substance of Wise's
> defense. This sort of thing only deepens my suspicions about
> antiracism's status within the comfort zone of
> neoliberalism's discourses of "reform." More to the point, I
> suspect as well that this vitriol toward radicalism is
> rooted partly in the conviction that a left politics based
> on class analysis and one focused on racial injustice are
> Manichean alternatives.
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list