On Oct 6, 2009, at 9:56 AM, shag carpet bomb wrote:
> so you approve of Michaels characterization of the work done by
> folks like Laura Agustin on immigrant sex workers? That of David
> Harvey in Potter Addition? They're just a bunch o f people who seek
> to obtain respect for the poor and working class, right? Their
> interest in 'agency' isn't to be taken seriously -- charachterized
> in a sympathetic, internally critical way -- but is simply dismissed
> out of hand as the work of handmaidens to neo-liberalism.
This is delusional.