>Itt sounds o.k. to me. But the very need for it suggests that you won't
>change anyone's mind. When people take positions that wrong, they
>probably can't be argued out of them.
True enough (though I do see a bit of movement in one person--I'll take it), but I'm arguing for the audience, not the opponent.
And thanks for your time and attention, Carrol.
Thanks,
John A
http://www.arkansawyer.com/wordpress/