>>I would assume you can't answer that by talking about people,
>>you will have to talk about relations between and among people, andin
>>doing so you will have left people behind to talk of social forces.
>
>
>Again, you think this is news to people?
On second thought, this is news to me. How do you separate "people" and "social forces" so cleanly?
This sounds to me as difficult as separating ink from the gallon of milk you just spilled it in.