> I think I've figured out some of our problem. You define materialism
> like I - and every Marxist, sociologist and philosopher I've ever met -
> define realism...
Or, put another way, materialism is realism with an extra m, a, t, and i. It also seems to have an attachment which looks suspiciously like a Blu-ray drive. Obviously, further grant-subsidized research is needed!
-- DRR