while I agree that we should be skeptical of research (Healey is making that point too but wants to improve research, not throw the baby out with the huggies), isn't it kind of, i don't know, condescending to assume they can't even get the basics? (yes, i agree that lawyers and physicians and psychiatriasts are not "real" doctors. the only ppl who should be called doctors are phuds. Someone posted the history of that remarkable turnabout on this list some years ago.)
but still.... i mean, you dno't actually think you are so much brighter that they wouldn't know to actually compare SSRIs to other types of anti-depressants? (In fact, that is often what they *have* to do: compare a new drug with an older treatment to demonstrate that it offers an improvement for treatment either through better results and/or fewer side effects).
Anyway, here's Healey:
"Other data sets provide similar findings. For instance, in Pierre Fabre's clinical trial database of approximately 8,000 patients, the rate for suicide attempts on SSRIs appears to be 3 times the rate for other antidepressants [26]. However, these other sources have a mixture of trials. The current analysis limits the number of studies but ensures that they should be roughly comparable and the selection of studies is based on regulatory requirements rather than individual bias."
There's more here, where he speaks to specific research studies comparing SSRIs and other types of treatment:
http://www.healyprozac.com/EditorsDilemma/Psychotherapy_Psychosomatics.pdf