[lbo-talk] Polanski

Shane Mage shmage at pipeline.com
Tue Sep 29 15:50:09 PDT 2009



> On Sep 29, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Shane Mage wrote:
>> was *statutory* rape of a sexually mature girl
On Sep 29, 2009, Doug Henwood wrote:
>> "She was 13, she claims she said no, and he supposedly drugged her...
So it's not under dispute that the guy drugged and raped a 13-year-old girl"

Grand jury testimony is, almost by definition, coached. It is also, absolutely by definition, unchallengeable by cross examination or presentation of contradictory or exculpatory evidence. A prosecutors case is *always* under dispute until the trial verdict and often very long after. Remember Ethel Rosenberg!

What is *not under dispute* is that Polanski was sandbagged into a bait-and-switch plea bargain.

Shane Mage


> This cosmos did none of gods or men make, but it
> always was and is and shall be: an everlasting fire,
> kindling in measures and going out in measures."
>
> Herakleitos of Ephesos



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list