On Sep 30, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Shane Mage wrote:
> Prurient fascination with a prosecutor's version of a sexual
> encounter 30+ years ago lets some people treat it as a "fact."
> Grand Jury transcripts may make for good pornography. They ain't
> evidence any more than is a plea bargain.
It's more evidence than you've got for your version.
The French seem to have some notion of droit de seigneur at work, even if such a thing is fictitious.