This is what I recall reading at the time. Anyway, even if the judge and DA worked out the deal together it doesn't matter. Plea deals get changed. It happens every day. I know this first-hand. If Polanski didn't like the changes to the plea arrangement he could do what everyone else could do in such a case. Defend themselves. Apparently some rich white artists don't think they need to do that. He wasn't being forced to take a plea deal that wasn't to his liking any more as can be claimed for many defendants. Since he had the financial means to defend himself the options open to him were greater than that available to most defendants. His sense of entitlement is obvious here.
The idea that he wouldn't get a fair trial is laughable. Yeah, rich white guys never get fair trials in the US! If that alone is a plausible excuse for running then every minority and poor person in the US is equally justified. I expect everyone who defends Polanski on these grounds is OK with EVERY poor person and person of color simply walking out of court tomorrow and from here on claiming they cannot get a fair trial and we should just let their case drop. On the same grounds we'll have to release every poor person and person of color currently incarcerated. It is a laughable defense to claim Polanski was being unfairly treated. He was being treated with kid gloves but even they were too rough for his sensitive artistic temperament. Fuck 'em.
John Thornton