or do a number of these folks not count because they were around in the 90s, but never took a break, even if some of their best stuff was produced, new, in the 00s? Probably less nostalgic than many 48-year-olds, but I still prefer 1982-1992...
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:25 AM, B. <docile_body at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Disqualified from the get-go: Old bands that released new material in the
> past 10 years. That is, Wire, etc., who came out with solid releases, but
> who nonetheless did not begin n the past decade.
>
> I mean NEW bands whose members in whatever capacity - NOT old bands who
> came back with new releases last decade (like Wire oo Killing Joke). We're
> talking NEW bands within the last 10 years, folks.
>
> Someone suggested this to me as an exercise to see if one had fallen into a
> nostalgia/"things were better back in the days"-type time warp. You know,
> avoiding getting trapped in a musical oubliette the way one'sparents did. My
> mom and step-dad are stuck in a pre-1975 time warp. Apparently nothing good
> or "authentic" or "soulful" came out past that hallowed date. 30- and
> 4-somethings seem to feel the same way re: songs that came out after 1995.
>
> So, 2000 - 2010 - best NEW bands/releases in the most recent decade? :)
>
>