>Who. was. doing. this???? Everyone who engaged with him did so on a
>fairly specific level of precise statements he insisted on defending,
>pedantically, and arrogantly, despite very specific textual and
>logical arguments contradicting his claims. [SHAAAGGGGGG!@#$%^&*(]
>Further, the claim that he's interested in dialogue and discussion
>rather than programs and proscriptions has in these interchanges been
>fundamentally disproven: this is fine, but he should not act as if his
>project is not a doctrinaire one. It has a doctrine and it seems to
>be only slightly to the left of the reactionary turn at a journal like
>Telos, with the possible exception of their being slightly more room
>to engage in open ended theoretical exploration of a mainstream
>libertarian/neo-new left variety rather than circle jerking over the
>Schmitt cookie and fighting over who gets to eat it.
also, Paul Piccone at least smoke big fat stogies. and yelled a lot. from what I heard.