[lbo-talk] History, necessity and the New Zealand Wars

Mike Beggs mikejbeggs at gmail.com
Sat Apr 10 18:38:04 PDT 2010


On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Chris Doss <lookoverhere1 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't what he is describing with the Maori trading with the British what usually, and predictably, happens when a technologically primitive society comes in contact with a technologically advanced one? Obviously, if I am in a stone-age society, and some guys move next door with guns and other cool stuff (GAOCS), I am going to try to get some of that awesome GAOCS. The very existence of the GAOCS prevents me from just attacking them and taking it, because they will kill me, and even if I did I don't know how to make GAOCS myself. So, the best option is offering them something that they want in exchange for the GAOCS, i.e., trade.

Yep, they generally didn't want Europeans to clear out, they just wanted to not be swamped and to keep their land. Maori society was pretty dynamic, by the way, and settled, semi-agricultural with trade links up and down the island. The arrival of muskets had totally transformed their politics, and potatoes totally transformed their economy half a century before the British colonies took off. Maori were expert with firearms by the time of the Land Wars and developed trench warfare tactics.

The arrival of the colonists did totally transform tribal production in some areas, especially in the north, developing specialised agriculture for the settler market. Certainly if there was a 'Polynesian mode of production' it was becoming integrated into the world market. It seems quite possible to me that it could have developed into capitalism even if Maori remained politically independent, but of course that doesn't mean the land grabs and imperial domination were inevitable or justified.

Mike Beggs



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list