[lbo-talk] agricultural productivity (was Thatcherism)

Michael Perelman michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
Sun Apr 18 13:47:28 PDT 2010


Agricutural productivity depends upon the metric you use. The most common is output per unit of labor. So you get an innovation, such as the short handled hoe, to drive workers harder.

Is that an improvement?

Also, much agricultural productivity does not necessarily come from agriculture. The railroad made an entirely different agriculture possibly.

What about the damage to the land. The Asians farmed the same rice paddies for more than 40 centuries. Other Asians denuded the land.

How can you compare Siberian agriculture with lush California Valleys? Does the conquest of Mexican lands constitute agricultural improvment?

Finally modern agriculture depends upon water. Figuring out how to allocate water is a can of worms. Should the Chinese dam up the water in Tibet & dry out India? Is the Israeli theft of water from Palestine part of productivity?

-- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu michaelperelman.wordpress.com



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list