>Understanding the current war seems part of US historic involvement.
>Is the event of 911 not related to our wars? If the event was used
>to justify the wars, while the wars seemed not to be concerned with
>redressing the event, it seems entirely within reason to question
>the 'bull story' that has displaced the historic narrative. When the
>'broke and inshane' public seems to be willing to consider the event
>in the framework of the US history of false flag incidents, should
>they be discouraged, or should the conversation be engaged
Aren't you the same guy who a couple days ago said this when the subject was understanding labor and capital?:
>, but the slicing and dicing that goes on with definitions doesn't
>seem to serve the interest of building the 'movement', of
>understanding what's going on or what is to be done
And now you're saying that loopy discussions about 9/11 should be engaged in?
Fuck me.