On 8 December 2010 21:38, ken hanly <northsunm at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Here is why Catln's lawyer thinks the case could be difficult and embarrassing
> for Swedish authorities. Your interpretation fits in with the remark of a
> Swedish lawyer that in Sweden only a lawyer can know if you are raped.
> Interesting that the mainstream media seems uninterested in these details.
>
> ""The phenomena of social networking through the internet and mobile phones
> constrains Swedish authorities from augmenting the evidence against Assange
> because it would look even less credible in the face of tweets by Anna Ardin and
> SMS texts by Sofia Wilén boasting of their respective conquests after the
> “crimes”.
> In the case of Ardin it is clear that she has thrown a party in Assange’s honour
> at her flat after the “crime” and tweeted to her followers that she is with the
> “the world’s coolest smartest people, it’s amazing!”. Go on the internet and see
> for yourself. That Ardin has sought unsuccessfully to delete these exculpatory
> tweets from the public record should be a matter of grave concern. That she has
> published on the internet a guide on how to get revenge on cheating boyfriends
> ever graver. The exact content of Wilén’s mobile phone texts is not yet known
> but their bragging and exculpatory character has been confirmed by Swedish
> prosecutors. Niether Wilén’s nor Ardin’s texts complain of rape. ""
> http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/02/when-it-comes-to-assange-r-pe-case-the-swedes-are-making-it-up-as-they-go-along/
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Wendy Lyon <wendy.lyon at gmail.com>
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Sent: Wed, December 8, 2010 6:15:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Julian Assange arrested in London
>
> On 7 December 2010 22:12, ken hanly <northsunm at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> According to accounts the women gave to the police and friends, they each had
>> consensual sexual encounters with Mr. Assange that became nonconsensual. One
>> woman said that Mr. Assange had ignored her appeals to stop after a condom
>>broke
>
> In the common law, that would be rape (refusing to stop after consent
> has been withdrawn). I don't know anything about Swedish law though.
> ___________________________________