At 11:37 PM 2/4/2010, MICHAEL YATES wrote:
>I have never in my life attacked the rural. Southern Utah is one of my
>very favorite locales and hardly anyone lives there. I don't much like
>suburbs and exurbs. The houses are too big and wasteful of energy. Most
>of them are pretty ugly too. All too often people never leave their
>houses, and there is not much social interaction. Too much of the rural
>has been destroyed to make the suburbs and exurbs (like in John Gorka's
>song Houses in the Fields.) Please note that I am not making any comments
>on the people who live in suburbs, exurbs, or in the countryside. Or
>cities, either. Except to say that there appears to be a lot of human
>misery in all of them. Not to say that there isn't joy too.
>
>
>
>I don't want to inflame Carrol Cox, so let me just say that, for me, I
>have to try to get the lay of the land. Kept me out of harm's way on more
>than one occasion! Learning the lay of the land and how it was changing
>(which is part of what it is in the first place) helped us, for example,
>to grasp that it might be possible to unionize the workers on the campus
>where I taught. What we have to try to grasp, as best we can, are the
>possibilites implict in the lay of the land. What are the tendencies?
>
>
>
>And the lay of the land doesn't just change. We do make our own history,
>even though the weight of the past
>
>is bearing down on us.
>
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
-- http://cleandraws.com Wear Clean Draws ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)