> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Max Sawicky <sawicky at verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > Bush II was clearly better on social spending.
>
> Was this mostly or all Medicare Part D?
>
Which was a ridiculous boondoggle.
There was also NCLB, which has its well-known problems, but did plow a lot of money into schools - am I wrong on this?