[lbo-talk] Douthat on class and race in and college admissions

Joseph Catron jncatron at gmail.com
Tue Jul 20 12:41:10 PDT 2010


"Last year, two Princeton sociologists, Thomas Espenshade and Alexandria Walton Radford, published a book-length study<http://press.princeton.edu/titles/9072.html>of admissions and affirmative action at eight highly selective colleges and universities. Unsurprisingly, they found that the admissions process seemed to favor black and Hispanic applicants, while whites and Asians needed higher grades and SAT scores to get in. But what was striking, as Russell K. Nieli pointed out last week<http://www.mindingthecampus.com/originals/2010/07/how_diversity_punishes_asians.html>on the conservative Web site Minding the Campus, was which whites were most disadvantaged by the process: the downscale, the rural and the working-class.

"This was particularly pronounced among the private colleges in the study. For minority applicants, the lower a family’s socioeconomic position, the more likely the student was to be admitted. For whites, though, it was the reverse. An upper-middle-class white applicant was three times more likely to be admitted than a lower-class white with similar qualification ... "Nieli highlights one of the study’s more remarkable findings: while most extracurricular activities increase your odds of admission to an elite school, holding a leadership role or winning awards in organizations like high school R.O.T.C., 4-H clubs and Future Farmers of America actually works against your chances."

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/19/opinion/19douthat.html

-- "Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre, mod sceal þe mare, þe ure mægen lytlað."



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list