[lbo-talk] Texas school board drops Jefferson, adds Calvin

Jeffrey Fisher jeff.jfisher at gmail.com
Tue Mar 16 14:12:15 PDT 2010


It's true they're talking about world history. But in this sense, the switch is if anything less sensible. We're talking about revolutions after 1750, which Jefferson certainly had more influence on (both in the US and in France) than Calvin and Aquinas combined.

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Michael Smith <mjs at smithbowen.net> wrote:


> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:30:34 -0400
> Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:
>
> > Like I say, I'm no fan of Jefferson. But he's pretty important to
> > the evolution of American politics, no?
>
> He little knows of 'Murrca
> That only 'Murrca knows.
>
> Seriously, I was being unserious -- well, semi-serious. What's
> taught as "American history" in America is such a sad gallimaufry
> of propagandistic nonsense that the poor kiddies would be better off
> reading Marvel comics; almost any change would be an improvement,
> under the law of regression to the mean; best of all would be to
> ignore the subject altogether; and in *Texas*, well...!
>
> But to pursue the subject semi-seriously -- one of the core
> nonsensicalities of 'Murrcan history as she is taught is what
> you might call "American originalism" -- the idea that the Founders
> were mighty thinkers who had so many new bran-new ideas every day
> they had to have slaves to keep track of 'em. If the kiddies are
> going to be reading anybody, better they should read people who
> actually were important thinkers.
>
> Now qua politician, Jefferson is certainly an important figure. Why,
> he gave us the Democratic Party! There's reason enough to dig him
> up and give him the Oliver Cromwell postmortem honors.
>
> --
>
> Michael J. Smith
> mjs at smithbowen.net
> http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org
> http://fakesprogress.blogspot.com
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list