Carrol
brad wrote:
>
> >* And the Big Six are chasing after their share of $500 billion in annual *
> >* advertising expenditure. Fox could stop broadcasting tomorrow, but
> nothing *
> >* would change. *
> >* *
> >* The only solution: build the digital commons, pixel by pixel. *
> >* *
> >* -- DRR *
>
> Isn't part of it that Fox (and most of the rest of commercial media) say
> things and characterize events in a way that many people in the U.S. like to
> hear?
> shrill
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> I don't know what "the way that many people in the US like to hear" means.
> Do you mean that they are genetically predisposed to like to hear these
> things? Or do you mean that because of the particular socialization and
> political/economic environment combined with the prior programing by
> commercial media people like these things?
>
> DDR, I don't think this is true. It is not just that they are capitalist
> media firms. There is also the historical process of the particular class
> struggle interacting with specific forms of political, cultural and
> social processes of development. In a word: contingency. It
> isn't predetermined that capitalist media will take the particular form that
> Fox News has.
>
> Brad
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk