He thinks it much more important that 48% of the population sympathize with the tea party attitudes and beliefs (as compared with 44% for Obama) in the NYT poll. Its the outreach that the left should be reaching out to. He thinks that what the left should be doing is "what it did in the 1930s, when there was also a very dangerous nativist movement, but it was countered by working class organizing."
On 5/14/10 8:12 PM, CGreen7223 at aol.com wrote:
> Chomsky keeps implying that the Tea Partiers are a bunch of working class
> folks victimized by neoliberalism. I wonder if he has seen the numerous
> studies showing that the Tea Partiers are, to a large extent, privileged middle
> class and upper middle class workers and petit bourgeois who really don't
> have much in the way of "real grievances" but are a bunch of racist,
> ignorant spoiled people made even more ignorant and racist by talk radio
> demagogues. I can't imagine that somebody hasn't called his attention to these
> studies about the Tea Party.
>
> And Joe Stack is not typical of the Tea Partiers. Most Tea Party people
> seem to think big business is just fine. They all probably think, because Rush
> Limbaugh says so, that the financial crises was caused by the government
> forcing the banks to give mortgages to black and brown people who couldn't
> afford to pay them back and which required the poor banks to create toxic
> financial instruments to try to make the mortgages profitable, and so on.
>
>
> In a message dated 5/14/2010 10:58:39 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> cb31450 at gmail.com writes:
>
> CHOMSKY: HOW THE TEA PARTIERS ARE GETTING SCREWED BY THEIR OWN IDEOLOGY
> By Noam Chomsky, In These Times
> 'We should not underestimate the depth of moral indignation
> that lies behind the furious, often self-destructive
> bitterness about government and business power."
> http://www.alternet.org/story/146852/chomsky%3A_how_the_tea_partiers_are_get
> ting_screwed_by_their_own_ideology