[lbo-talk] Haaretz: Israel: Fascism with a confused face

Michael Pollak mpollak at panix.com
Wed May 19 03:35:09 PDT 2010


[I'm normally hyper-allergic to the fascism meme. But this guy does it so well the article was over before I objected. A good example of how much sharper the debate is in Israel than in the US and how much sharper what they are saying now -- in Haaretz -- than ever before. And sadly, how much less influence they have.]

http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/special-place-in-hell/special-place-in-hell-rebranding-israel-as-a-state-headed-for-fascism-1.290977

May 18, 2010, 3:12 pm Haaretz Blogs

Special Place in Hell: Rebranding Israel as a state headed for fascism

No one knows fascism better than Israelis. By Bradley Burston

SHEIKH JARRAH, East Jerusalem - No one knows fascism better than

Israelis. They are schooled, drilled in the history, the mechanics, the

horrendous potential of fascist regimes. Israelis know fascism when

they see it. In others.

They might well have expected when fascism began taking root here, it

would arise at a time of a national leadership of galvanizing charisma

and sweeping, powerfully orchestrated modes of action.

But that would have been much too obvious to deny. And it would take

denial, inertia, selective memory, a sense that things - bad as they

are - can go on like this indefinitely, for fascism to be able gain its

foothold in a country founded in its very blood trail.

In fact, it has taken the most dysfunctional, the most rudderless

government Israel has ever known, to make moderates uncomfortably aware

of the countless but largely cosmetized ways in which the right in

Israel and its supporters abroad have come to plant and nurture the

seeds of fascism.

Wrote Boaz Okun, the mass-circulation Yedioth Ahronot's legal affairs

commentator and a retired Israeli judge, of Israel's ban on Noam

Chomsky: "The decision to shut up Professor Chomsky is a decision to

shut down freedom in the state of Israel.

"I'm not speaking of the stupidity of supplying ammunition to those who

claim that Israel is fascist," Okun wrote, "rather, of our fear that we

may actually be turning that way."

At the weekend, Israeli police riot troops waded into a thoroughly

non-violent sit-in near the entrance to this East Jerusalem settlement

zone, where Palestinian residents were expelled by Israeli court order,

to allow their homes to be taken over by Jews.

What was curious here was not the neck-wrenching brutality of the Yasam

riot police in their gunmetal gray uniforms, bristling with assault

rifles, clubs, tear gas and helmets, arrayed against the demonstrators,

most of of them Israeli Jews, some of them well past retirement age.

What was surprising was not the fact that several burly officers,

seeing a young Reshet Bet (Israel State Radio news) reporter - his

microphone clearly and unmistakably marked, interview one of the seated

demonstrators - jump him and drag him away in a headlock to a police

custody van.

In the end, what was peculiar was that the police seemed so entirely

bewildered, so completely lacking in clear orders, left on their own to

decide how to proceed in an arena of hair-trigger sensitivity. Fascism

with a confused face.

Why should we be concerned by any of this? Perhaps because we have made

our peace with a number of factors that can turn a society toward

fascism as a solution.

1. Losing a War.

We've lost two in the space of less than three years. Our targets,

Hezbollah and Hamas, are better armed and entrenched than ever. Our

strategic and diplomatic standing is in decline. Iran and Syria are

ascendant. And there is abundant reason to suspect that the Gaza War, a

major factor in the loss of our international standing, may have been

altogether avoidable, the huge civilian death toll indefensible and

unconscionable. This has, in turn, led to

2. International quarantine, a sense of being scapegoated, and a search

for an internal fifth column.

3. A radical redefinition of positive values.

Look no further than the name of Jerusalem's obscene Museum of

Tolerance project.

4. Olfactory fatigue

We have grown desensitized to the consequences of actively denying

basic staples and construction supplies to 1.5 million people in Gaza,

many of them still waiting to rebuild homes we destroyed.

We have grown inured to the appropriation of Palestinian-owned West

Bank land, to abusive treatment of law-abiding Palestinians at

checkpoints, to the ill-treatment and summary expulsion of foreign

workers, to racist, anti-democratic and, yes, fascistic rulings by

extreme rightist rabbis, especially some of those holding official

positions in the West Bank.

5. Fascism by rubber stamp.

"There are a million reasons why someone would be denied entry into

Israel," Interior Ministry spokeswoman Sabine Hadad said Monday, when

asked about the ministry's border policies in the wake of the Chomsky

ban.

"There may be a million reasons, but try to find a single criterion for

entry refusal and you'll hit a blank wall," said Association for Civil

Rights in Israel attorney Oded Feller. "The Interior Ministry simply

doesn't publish them, despite a court ruling that ordered them to do

so."

6. The sense that despite everything, all is well.

There will be those who argue that the fact that I, or my Haaretz

colleagues, are allowed to publish what we do, is proof that there is

no fascism here, nor evidence of a police state.

The fact is that were we not Israeli Jews, and part of an establishment

institution, any of us could find ourselves tossed out on the same

pavement, and with the same lack of due process and due explanation, as

Noam Chomsky.

7. The sense that there is a war on now, when there isn't.

8. Selective enforcement of court rulings. Routine defiance of same, in

particular by radical settlers

9. The 180-degree untruth that officials allow Israeli and Jerusalem

Arabs to do what they want, while cracking down on their Jewish

neighbors.

10. Equating criticism of the government with favoring the destruction

of Israel.

This has become increasingly felt beyond Israel's borders. In San

Francisco, the canary in the coal mine of free discourse within the

Jewish community, the Jewish Federation [JCF] recently revised and

tightened the terms under which it agrees to grant funds to

organizations.

"The JCF does not fund organizations that through their mission,

activities or partnerships ... advocate for, or endorse, undermining

the legitimacy of Israel as a secure independent, democratic Jewish

state, including through participation in the Boycott, Divestment and

Sanctions (BDS) movement, in whole or in part."

The guidelines go on to state that "Presentations by organizations or

individuals that are critical of particular Israeli government policies

but are supportive of Israel's right to exist as a secure independent

Jewish democratic state" are "generally in accord with the policy

statement," but "early JCRC [Jewish Community Relations Council]

consultation is strongly encouraged and the programming should be

presented within an overall program strategy that is consistent with

JCF's core values."

Can all this have spread this far, this fast? Because of Israel, have

Bay Area Jews who do not believe in a specifically Jewish state, now

forfeited their right to be part of the Jewish community? Have Jews who

love Israel but are seen as too critical, or who support a boycott to

make their criticisms manifest, been effectively excommunicated?

It's a free country, I guess.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list