Somebody on this list once commented that the quality of the federal justice system is far superior to the state justice systems in most if not all states. The same applies to education, imho. What is more, there is a good reason for federal rather than local funding of education. Education is a public good - it benefits society as a whole not just a particular locality. A person educated in one locality is likely to move to another locality after completing his/her schooling - so the local funding of his/her education is in fact subsidizing other localities. Federal funding would eliminate that.
I understand that this argument goes against the idiotic infatuation of the American public with everything that appears "gemuetlich" and non-institutional - but that is another story.
Wojtek
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:37 PM, <123hop at comcast.net> wrote:
>
> [WS:]
>
> I think that the root cause of this mess is the local control of education
> -
> if you replace it with federal control and funding, a great deal of the
> current woes would disappear.
>
> This is not the case. Many school districts have lost total control, the
> poorer ones, the ones that don't ace the standard tests. That gives the feds
> or state pols who are in the pockets of the curriculum/testing industry the
> power to take over and make hay.
>
> NCLB and Race to the Top are both federal programs.
>
> Joanna
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>