[lbo-talk] Tea Party: less than meets the eye

[socialismorbarbarism]

SA, summing up: "Bottom line: Would you like to see a left-wing
multi-issue movement with 647 chapters, or would that be a
disappointment to you?"

I'm convinced by SA's argument, based on the Post's facts. The Tea
Party is a real political movement, unless one defines "political
movement" in a way that is so restrictive as to be effectively
meaningless.

Why the need to deny this?

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:26 PM, SA <s11131978 at gmail.com> wrote:
>  On 11/2/2010 5:41 PM, Doug Henwood wrote:
>
>> [cue the liberal fearmongers to refute this, since they need the TP - via
>> The Awl]
>>
>>
>> <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/02/AR2010110201301.html>
.....
>