[lbo-talk] voters, man

Gar Lipow the.typo.boy at gmail.com
Thu Nov 4 15:48:09 PDT 2010


Actually the soda tax/candy tax/bottled water tax was rejected as well as the income tax. So consistently "anti-tax, anti-debt, but if you bastards cut the services I approve of its cause you don't know how to live within your means". Yeah, a lot of paranoia that once we have an income tax it will apply to everyone because in two years the leg might extend it downward. Of course if the income tax is constitutional under the WA state constitution (something we won't get the chance to find out in the near future) then the State ledge could pass one right now if they wanted. Well, Patty Murray was probably saved to follow through on her proclaimed intent to vote for the catfood commission recs in the lame duck session. Cantwell intends that too. So yay for the Democrats saving social security! Though maybe we will be lucky and right will kill it because if symbolic cuts in the military budget and symbolic increases in taxes on the rich.

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Jeffrey Fisher <jeff.jfisher at gmail.com> wrote:
> That. "Successful" is understood to mean "moral, worthy" (because otherwise
> why/how could they be successful???).
>
> It's oh-so-bourgeois morality . . .
>
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:16 PM, <123hop at comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Soda and candy tax = sin tax = good.
>>
>> Tax on "rich" punishes those who are successful = bad.
>>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>

-- Facebook: Gar Lipow Twitter: GarLipow Grist Blog: http://www.grist.org/member/1598 Static Web Page: http://www.nohairshirts.com



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list