[lbo-talk] voters, man
Gar Lipow
the.typo.boy at gmail.com
Thu Nov 4 15:48:09 PDT 2010
Actually the soda tax/candy tax/bottled water tax was rejected as well
as the income tax.
So consistently "anti-tax, anti-debt, but if you bastards cut the
services I approve of its cause you don't know how to live within your
means". Yeah, a lot of paranoia that once we have an income tax it
will apply to everyone because in two years the leg might extend it
downward. Of course if the income tax is constitutional under the WA
state constitution (something we won't get the chance to find out in
the near future) then the State ledge could pass one right now if they
wanted. Well, Patty Murray was probably saved to follow through on her
proclaimed intent to vote for the catfood commission recs in the lame
duck session. Cantwell intends that too. So yay for the Democrats
saving social security! Though maybe we will be lucky and right will
kill it because if symbolic cuts in the military budget and symbolic
increases in taxes on the rich.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Jeffrey Fisher <jeff.jfisher at gmail.com> wrote:
> That. "Successful" is understood to mean "moral, worthy" (because otherwise
> why/how could they be successful???).
>
> It's oh-so-bourgeois morality . . .
>
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:16 PM, <123hop at comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Soda and candy tax = sin tax = good.
>>
>> Tax on "rich" punishes those who are successful = bad.
>>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
--
Facebook: Gar Lipow
Twitter: GarLipow
Grist Blog: http://www.grist.org/member/1598
Static Web Page: http://www.nohairshirts.com
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list