[lbo-talk] Tea Party: less than meets the eye

Wojtek S wsoko52 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 10 09:08:54 PST 2010


Alan: WS, if you read the whole sentence and pay attention to its structure and components,"

[WS:} I leave that to lit critters. If you do not have anything to say on the substance, I'd prefer you do not waste my time.

Wojtek

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Alan Rudy <alan.rudy at gmail.com> wrote:


> WS, if you read the whole sentence and pay attention to its structure and
> components, giving weight to them in turn, and then thought about the
> content of the many posts Marv has made over recent weeks, you'd know the
> answer to your question and not need to get your hackles up...
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Wojtek S <wsoko52 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Marv: "to lead the workers to state power through forms of political
> class
> > struggle ranging from demonstrations to armed insurrection, its highest
> > form."
> >
> > [WS:] Now, be serious. You do not really believe that armed insurrection
> > is
> > even remotely an option in the EU or the US, do you? The main point of
> my
> > posting was that the way to go is not a direct action but an
> institutional
> > solution, such as a "modest proposal" by Varoufakis - which in my opinion
> > has a chance of getting state support to stave off a breakdown, even if
> the
> > elites oppose it. Do you have an opinion on it?
> >
> >
> > Wojtek
> >
> >
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list