I hate to be a spoil-sport, but where is the evidence that breaking the hegemony of capital results in non-citizens being treated better? North Korea?
This is the sort of bizarre question which makes me think that SA at heart is a deeply committed fan of rational choice individualism, and even leads him to fantasize a nation making such an abstract choice as though that nation were a single isolated individual.
There is no evidence whatever for _any_ prediction of what a nation would do coming out of a long, complex, probably bloody process by which a constituent assembly would come into existence.
Such a transformation would _also_ bring about an utterly unpredictable transformation of the residents of scuh a nation.
SA believes in making rational choices of pigs-in-the-poke.
Carrol