On 9/1/2010 1:42 PM, Marv Gandall wrote:
> Many political challenges to the status quo have been and are "serious".
[...]
> none threatened the existence of the "bourgeois democratic system" in periods other than economic depression and, in the case of defeated powers, war.
>
If challenges to the status quo can be serious even if they don't threaten the bourgeois democratic system, why can't they be serious and attached to one of the main parties?
SA