On 9/2/2010 3:24 PM, Eric Beck wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Shane Mage<shmage at pipeline.com> wrote:
>
>> The Heinrich article is a good example of abstract impossibilism. Nowhere
>> does it offer a critique of the draft program as a whole, nowhere a
>> formulation of concrete improvements to it.
> Which is exactly the say to proceed. Like Marx did with the Gotha
> program. There's no sense into delving in to particulars when the
> whole framework is rotten.
>
Marx did this with the Gotha program? There were no particulars? Is there some other version of the Critique of the Gotha Program that I haven't read?
SA