[lbo-talk] Strauss Kahn

Bill Bartlett billbartlett at aapt.net.au
Wed Aug 24 16:46:03 PDT 2011

At 9:11 AM -0400 24/8/11, Wojtek S wrote:

>Doug: "Well, yeah, but how do you think a trial would go if the only
>witness had completely concocted a story about a gang rape in her
>[WS:] I think the case would have had a very different outcome if the
>defendant were not some stinking rich/high status bastard - probably
>prosecutors would have offered some "plea bargaining" agreement in
>exchange for a more lenient sentence, as it is often the case.
>Prosecutors enjoy a wide range of discretion in these matters, no?

So your complaint is that the rich get justice, rather than that the poor don't?

Essentially, the system would have denied a poor person a trial at all, by blackmailing them into pleading guilty. Whereas a rich person gets the special privilege of a trial because they can afford the massive expense entailed.

>In any case, whether Strauss-Kahn was "pillorized" by the gutter press
>or got away with a crime thanks to his status and wealth, the fact of
>the matter is that while the US has the highest per capita prison
>population in world - the rich are rarely prosecuted and almost never
>put behind bars in this country, except when they screw other rich.
>Can anyone deny that? Shane?

Perhaps. But the solution would be to extend justice to the poor, rather than give the rich equal treatment.

Bill Bartlett Bracknell Tas

More information about the lbo-talk mailing list