Yeah, I got the feeling that SA is downright embarrassed by most of the rest of us :-).
> why do they know so much about her past?
>
> why were they listening in on her conversations? why did they know about her bank account.
>
> somewhere i read an anti-rape activist say that a woman's past doesn't matter in a rape trial, but apparently it does in this case. how can it possibly be OK for either the prosecution or defense to have access to her financial transactions?
>
> shouldn't that shit be off limits?
Yes, seriously. Was the prosecution’s suspicion/claim of inconsistency in her testimony the excuse to go scavenging as deep and wide as they seem to have done?
—ravi