> absolutely. well, and of course "natural" and "social" are kind of the
> same thing, when we're talking about it this way. no?
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:14 PM, shag carpet bomb
> <shag at cleandraws.com> wrote:
>> yes. heartbreaking. very very interesting insights into language,
>> socialization, the way that social interaction is absolutely
>> required
>> for any of that to take root, her inability to be touched or hugged
>> without recoiling in fear, terror, and pain, tendencies toward
>> tantrums and anger, ...
>>
>> so much that we think is natural is totally dependent on the social.
>>
>>
>>> seriously.