On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:50 PM, shag carpet bomb <shag at cleandraws.com> wrote:
> i agree on that one, yeah, but I was speaking of a separation because
> it seems that's the way most folks think about it. heaven forfend if
> i'd written socially constituted or socially constructed. :)
>
>> absolutely. well, and of course "natural" and "social" are kind of the
>> same thing, when we're talking about it this way. no?
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:14 PM, shag carpet bomb
>> <shag at cleandraws.com> wrote:
>>> yes. heartbreaking. very very interesting insights into language,
>>> socialization, the way that social interaction is absolutely
>>> required
>>> for any of that to take root, her inability to be touched or hugged
>>> without recoiling in fear, terror, and pain, tendencies toward
>>> tantrums and anger, ...
>>>
>>> so much that we think is natural is totally dependent on the social.
>>>
>>>
>>>> seriously.
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>