[lbo-talk] Edmund Wilson on Stalin

Wojtek S wsoko52 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 12 07:10:57 PST 2011


Carrol: "No matter who ruled in Russia, or how good their intentions or how "correct" their Marxism, the casualties would still have run into the millions. This is not a defense of Stalin."

[WS:] This is probably true, the cost would have been high no matter who was in power. Let's call it "necessary violence" for analytic purposes. However, it seems that Stalin added a fair amount of discretionary violence to the mix (cf. the Moscow trials), raising it well above what was necessary. Ditto for Mao (cf. the Cultural revolution). We should not sweep that discretionary violence introduced by particular leaders under the rug of the violence that was necessary to move the revolutionary project ahead.

Wojtek



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list