[lbo-talk] why Paul is a fascist

Joseph Catron jncatron at gmail.com
Fri Dec 23 13:16:42 PST 2011

I'm no fan of bourgeois international law, but when I use the term "apartheid" (as I frequently do in the Palestinian context), it refers to a specific body of it: the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. If someone wants to argue that American racism constitutes the crime of apartheid according to it, that's a case they're welcome to make. They may be completely wrong, but they won't be talking pure gibberish, as so many "anti-fascists" do.

On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Carrol Cox <cbcox at ilstu.edu> wrote:

"Apartheid," as recently illustrated on this
> list, can really distort understanding of and resistance to racial
> oppression in the U.S.

-- "Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre, mod sceal þe mare, þe ure mægen lytlað."

More information about the lbo-talk mailing list