[lbo-talk] Lind on the post-union future

Somebody Somebody philos_case at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 22 22:54:16 PST 2011


wrobert: But at a basic level, who is going to organize for these universal rights, and more significantly, who is going to act as an everyday defender of those rights.

Somebody: This is the crucial issue here. Yes, in the abstract it would be better for universal labor rights and social welfare to prevail. But, in really existing capitalism, you need organized labor as an (admittedly modest) counterbalance to the bourgeoisie and it's unofficial representatives.

Lind is a truly noxious figure. He promotes a kind of national chauvinist protectionist ideal of American capitalism, a fortress America impervious to foreign intrusion, in which big manufacturers and a monolithic federal bureaucracy run the country on behalf of the little people. Honestly, I could see him aligning with right-wing populist parties elsewhere in the world, in countries as diverse as Poland and Sri Lanka.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list