>
> [WS:] It depends how you look at this. They were clearly aware of the
> potential malfeasance of managers, and instituted measures to control it.
> One of them was the institutional structures of the party. Each major
> production unit had a party cell that answered to the party structures
> rather than to the firm's management. The idea here was to have an
> independent "watch dog," somewhat similar to to the role of the board of
> directors in the US. As far as i know, it seldom worked as intended
> because party secretaries often covered up questionable practices of firms
> management instead of reporting them.
Thank you Wojtek. I really appreciate your replies. It seems you´re the only one who understood my question, and decided to reply instead of attacking the questions being made. :)
FC