Instead, expressing your moral superiority by means of unacknowledged incapacity you prefer to ask me to take the time summarize the _various_ positions taken on the issue by a range of participants?
This is on you, not me... I actually remember things I've seen on this list, try to explore the earlier iterations/expression as a means of refreshing my memory of where we've been if an issue comes up again and I want to post, and/or, after failing to remember something I admit to failing to do so when it is pointed out. Most of all, the last thing I'd ever do is assume that there's a party line here - have you paid any attention to the diversity of thought on just about every issue discussed... or is self-righteous victimhood your preferred mode of polemic? When you were an academic, how'd you feel about people who reinvented a spoke on the wheel because they couldn't or wouldn't do a decent literature review but nevertheless claimed to be making original and insightful contributions? I know how I felt about such basic intellectual incompetence.
For your edification, I was wrong, it was last Feb and the subject line was: Fascism, right-wing populism, and contemporary research Finding this took about 10 seconds in the archives... all I did was search fascism rudy I'm sure you'll find plenty to disagree with but anything but a party line.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Wojtek S <wsoko52 at gmail.com> wrote:
> [WS:] Sorry for not knowing what Commissars of Politically Correct
> Definitions decided six months ago. I hope I will not be sent to a
> reeducation camp for that. Meanwhile, would you mind filling me in what
> point exactly I missed? Or is too much to ask?
>
> Wojtek
>
>