I have a fair amount of experience here, because I came to Arum and Roksa's conclusions over a decade ago. Since then I became director of my program, and my colleagues and I have worked to make sure that students do lots of challenging reading, write a lot, and spend much more time on task than students in other majors at this university. You can imagine how popular I make myself when I call attention to this institutional problem at faculty meetings. My colleagues get very defensive (and for good reason!) and administrators deflect, because they have no interest in taking on this fight.
The only way I see this changing at a particular institution is if folks at the top realize that this race to the bottom among its programs affects the economic value of the degree, and thereby makes it more difficult to recruit students. But that requires attentiveness to long-term problems and hard work to overcome the prisoner's dilemma I noted above. Possible, but bloody unlikely.
In the end, this will probably be framed as a story of lazy, tenured radicals and their intellectually lax victim studies programs. But that's not Arum and Roksa's story, which points toward a serious misalignment of institutional incentives.
----- Original Message ---- From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Sent: Wed, January 26, 2011 9:27:51 AM Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] How Much Do College Students Learn, and Study?
On Jan 26, 2011, at 10:02 AM, Alan Rudy wrote:
> Yup, its the teachers'/professors' fault for not mandating greater rigor
> (and I know that's not what you meant to imply, Doug
Now of course I don't mean that, but there really is something terrible going on, with, you know, kids today not reading. You may have noticed that thread on the Progressive Sociologists list the other week, looking for suggested excerpts from The Communist Manifesto to assign, because the full text is too long. It's about 40 pages, for god's sake. This is very bad. We can talk for a long time about what's produced this situation, but it's still very bad.
Doug ___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk