"To say that he was a capitalist tool is not enough. Capitalism has short term and long term possibilities & one may serve capitalism in many ways. FDR served capitalism too, but what a difference for the working class."
That is all true.
I think it was the consent of the majority in the monopoly bourgeoisie class (and their media) etc., that projected Obama. It had many benefits for them and it was their foresight as well.
A great image of USA was projected all over the world. US peoples' magnanimity..., etc.
The public inside the USA was as well given a boost--that if Obama can make his life so comfortable under this social system, what bothers you? An unprecedented recession, which had been on cards since 1998--the time when Clinton was trying to find one or the other pretext to invade Iraq--was emerging--everything seemed going wrong to the public opinion--inefficiency of the US ruling class and public disgust with it was hovering in the sky. Public distraction was needed direly.
Besides this, Chinese and French agents in Africa needed to be ousted from power and replaced by the US, if USA was to have lion's share in the economic contracts, activities, etc., there. Though in this plan, things haven't gone in the direction in which they would have liked to. It is US supported fellows that have seen hard times so far.
Obama was an excellent choice to address all these issues.
Zihannasheen