Carrol
-----Original Message----- From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org [mailto:lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org] On Behalf Of Miles Jackson Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 9:44 PM To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Capitalism RE: catastrophe
On 03/16/2011 06:07 PM, Carrol Cox wrote:
> Mike Beggs: This seems like a very liberal conception of freedom -
Berlin's
> negative liberty.
>
> -------
>
> It is _not_ a "conception" of freedom; it is an observation that freedom
> must _include_ the absence of some kinds of internal relations. And I was
> referring specifically to the pressure put on all corporations to control
> costs. _External_ relations do not create this form of unacceptable
> constraint. Consider two hypothetical Palace Economies: that of Ithaca and
> that of Sparta (see the Odyssey). The relationship of Menelaus of Sparta
to
> _his_ subordinate peasantry is not affected by the relationship of
Odysseus
> to _his_ subordinate peasantry. One or the other of these two may decided
to
> emulate the other in this respect, but that is a "free" decision, quite
> radically separate from the decisions of (say) two manufacturers of (say)
> memory chips, one in France, the other in India. They mutually constrain
> each other _regardless_ of any decisions either makes or desires to make.
> And when an entire global society is _dominated_ by this kind of internal
> relations, it is simply incompatible with the needs of human life. It has
> nothing whatever to do with the distinction between negative and positive
> freedom -- except, perhaps, that without this freedom positive freedom
> becomes pointless.
>
> Carrol
This kind of mare's nest of logical paradoxes leads me to the conclusion that freedom is best understood as an ideological precipitate of capitalism. Rather than assuming there is some true, uncorrupted core of freedom once we tear away capitalist social relations, I offer the admittedly disconcerning suggestion that talking about freedom can only reinforce capitalism. I recognize that this is one place where I substantively disagree with ol' Whiskers, but I do have to ask: why is it politically important to engage in the millenia-old determinism vs. free will debate?
MIles ___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk